As the 2024 US Presidential election approaches, digital information integrity experts are warning about the growing usage of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated material that might confuse or mislead voters.
Concerns regarding spreading fake information during political campaigns are growing due to emerging AI technologies that can produce convincing text, realistic visuals, and even video and audio, per CNN.
As campaigns ramp up and elections draw near, experts like Jevin West, a professor at the University of Washington and co-founder of the Center for an Informed Public, underline the potential influence that AI may have, which the public has already witnessed.
Election Integrity At Risk
Since social media firms serve as venues where billions of people look for information and dishonest individuals often propagate incorrect information, they must handle these hazards.
However, the multiple obstacles these businesses must overcome make it more and more challenging to keep up with the upcoming tsunami of inaccurate election-related material.
Election integrity, safety, and responsible AI teams have seen considerable layoffs due to numerous large social networks reducing their enforcement efforts on election-related disinformation over the previous several months.
Moreover, concerns regarding managing election-related misinformation have also been highlighted by a recent federal judge ruling restricting contact between several US authorities and social media corporations.
Despite an appeals court temporarily blocking the injunction, the judgment highlights the challenging environment social media firms must traverse.
The campaigns and elections in 2024 are significantly high risk due to the emergence of generative AI technologies that make it possible to quickly produce artificial content targeting specific audiences, with the use of computer-generated voice, video, and pictures.
Experts draw attention to several situations in which generative AI may produce fake news to mislead voters, malign politicians, or encourage violence, according to a PBS report.
Examples include fabricating video footage of speeches or interviews, automated robocalls with false information, manipulated audio recordings of candidates confessing to crimes or expressing racist views, and creating fake images that look like local news reports to spread false information.
Read also: : Meta's Threads Under Scrutiny as US House Judiciary Chair Seeks Content Moderation Docs
The recent incident involving a video that Florida Governor Ron DeSantis' presidential campaign shared on Twitter and which included AI-generated images of Donald Trump embracing Dr. Anthony Fauci highlighted the possible risks.
No, these images of Donald Trump hugging Anthony Fauci, posted by the DeSantis campaign, are not real. https://t.co/yvSmztf8zI
— WFAA (@wfaa) June 9, 2023
Twitter did not take down the video but instead posted a community remark to inform viewers of the AI-generated origin of the photos, even though fact-checking groups and watchful users soon recognized the phony images.
Addressing AI Problems with the Use of AI
AI-generated disinformation is a developing problem that demands various approaches to solve. Tools that give better information on the source and path of material are currently being developed. Aiming to assist artists in authenticating their photographs is the Content Authenticity Initiative, coordinated by Adobe.
According to Google, Meta, and Microsoft, they are actively implementing current regulations and creating fresh strategies to handle the particular problems presented by AI-generated material. These initiatives include systems for AI to recognize and filter hazardous information and fact-checking processes, per Axios.
Ironically, some professionals support employing AI to identify false information generated with the use of artificial intelligence. While a continuing arms race may emerge, it could be difficult for human content censors to keep up with the deluge of AI-generated material.
Educating the public to be discerning information consumers is essential. However, it requires a sizable investment and coordinated efforts, and it can encounter resistance from those who stand to gain from an uneducated populace.
