Amidst growing concerns surrounding intellectual property (IP) infringement within NFT marketplaces, the US Government has taken a notable step to address these issues. NFTs have surged in popularity but have also raised questions about copyright and trademark infringement.
(Photo : Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Bored Ape Yacht Club Wins Legal Battle Against Troll NFT Collection
Addressing Concerns
The US Government has recently addressed concerns regarding intellectual property (IP) infringement within non-fungible token (NFT) marketplaces.
Despite the NFT bubble bursting earlier, a report jointly conducted by the US Copyright Office (USCO) and the Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has concluded that existing intellectual property laws adequately handle copyright or trademark infringement issues in NFTs.
This study, initiated following a Senate request in 2022, acknowledges the benefits of NFTs but highlights the prevalence of trademark infringement and misuse on NFT platforms.
NFTs serve as digital certificates of authenticity, providing ownership of digital collectibles like artworks or music pieces. While NFTs verify the link to media, it's important to note that the content may or may not be stored on the blockchain, and the owner of an NFT's URL has the authority to modify the linked media.
Notable instances, such as Signal founder Moxie Marlinspike's creation of an NFT resembling a poop emoji, have raised awareness about the unpredictable nature of NFT content.
The agencies highlighted the potential of NFTs and smart contracts to assist trademark holders in managing, licensing, and transferring intellectual property (IP) rights.
Public feedback emphasized the financial benefits NFTs offer artists through future sales of their work. Despite criticisms of the aesthetic quality of some NFT art, the study acknowledged the positive economic opportunities they present.
However, the report also raised concerns about the lack of awareness among NFT buyers and sellers regarding the implications of IP rights in the creation, promotion, and exchange of NFTs. There's apprehension that NFTs could be exploited to facilitate copyright or trademark violations.
The report highlights the challenges posed by the decentralized structure of NFTs and blockchain networks when it comes to enforcing trademarks.
It points out that while certain NFT platforms have implemented protocols to support trademark enforcement, there's no overarching authority mandating such measures across all platforms.
Additionally, there's a lack of cross-platform mechanisms to enable trademark owners to identify and remove infringing content, resolve trademark disputes related to blockchain-based domain names, or verify sellers' ownership of trademark rights associated with the assets they sell.
Educating the Public
Considering these factors, the agencies emphasized the importance of educating the public about NFTs to foster a clearer understanding of these tokens and their mechanics.
Despite this, they advised Congress in their report that the existing use of NFTs does not warrant amendments to current IP legislation.
Furthermore, they indicated that integrating NFTs into their registration and record-keeping procedures is currently unnecessary and not recommended. In essence, they expressed reluctance to engage with NFTs at this juncture.
