Grammy Awards Announce New Rules: Only Human Creators Eligible for 2024, AI Barred from Winning

The Grammy Awards, one of the most prestigious events in the music industry, has made a bold move by updating its rules to exclude AI-generated music from eligibility for its awards explicitly.

The Recording Academy's recent rule change states that only human creators can win Grammy Awards, emphasizing the significance of human authorship in the creative process.

According to Variety, the Grammy Awards' new rules clearly state, "Only human creators are eligible to be submitted for consideration... A work that contains no human authorship is not eligible in any Categories."

This decision underscores the Academy's commitment to recognizing the creative excellence of human musicians and artists.

AI Won't be Replacing Artists at the GRAMMYS

While artists are still encouraged to explore and experiment with AI tools in their music-making process, the work submitted for Grammy consideration must demonstrate meaningful human authorship and be more than just a minimal contribution.

This requirement ensures that AI technology enhances rather than replaces human creators' artistic expression and talent.

A Wave of AI-Generated Music

AI-generated music has witnessed remarkable developments in recent years, with artists pushing the boundaries of what is possible in music creation.

Notably, music icon Paul McCartney revealed his intention to utilize AI to extract the voice of John Lennon for an upcoming "Final Beatles record." This innovative approach demonstrates how AI can be integrated into the creative process while preserving human artistry's essence.

However, AI-generated music has faced its fair share of controversy. In April, a song produced entirely by artificial intelligence titled "Heart On My Sleeve," imitating the styles of rapper Drake and pop artist The Weeknd, went viral on platforms like TikTok, YouTube, and Spotify.

However, it was eventually removed from different streaming platforms due to copyright issues. This incident has sparked debate over how to regulate AI technology in light of existing copyright regulations.

Embracing AI-Generated Music

On the other hand, some proponents of AI-generated music believe it represents an exciting evolution in the industry. They argue that these technologies enable new forms of artistic expression and can even push the boundaries of creativity.

Canadian synth-pop artist Grimes, for example, has embraced AI technology and offered her voice for use in AI-generated songs.

In a series of tweets, Grimes expressed her enthusiasm for the fusion of human artistry and AI, advocating for an open-source approach and dismissing concerns over copyright infringements.

We reported in November that, thanks to the miracles of machine learning and smart computer systems, an artist named Holly Herndon primed AI to record and memorize her voice, allowing it to sing any song in any language in any vocal range.

When asked about potential issues in her music, Herndon stated, "The thorny questions that are being asked right now - it's really important that we get them right."

What's Next?

As AI continues to advance and saturate various aspects of our lives, the Grammy Awards' decision to exclude AI-generated music from their awards marks a significant moment for the music industry.

The debate surrounding AI's role in music creation will undoubtedly continue, with artists and experts exploring the boundaries and possibilities of this rapidly evolving field.

Stay posted here at Tech Times.