Since the early 90s, video games have been used as a scapegoat for real-existence violence and other societal ills. While the online game industry has long attempted to veer away video game controversies, violent games are regularly dragged back into the conversation, often following tragic events --- including mass shootings.
Numerous research has debunked the concept that online game violence leads to actual violence. Still, the American Psychological Association (APA) has reaffirmed their stance on the matter, in an announcement released by APA president Sandra Shullman. The declaration comes from an evaluation of the APA's 2015 ruling on the issue.
Not all aggression = violence
While many research and press reports generally tend to apply the terms "aggression" and "violence" interchangeably, the APA highlighted that the current scientific literature has "not targeted on deadly violence as an outcome" of video game use.
The updated APA decision clarified that all violence, along with lethal violence, is aggression, but not all assault is violence. Thus, specializing in violent video games as a major reason for mass shootings is a distraction from better-hooked up reasons for violence, the APA says.
"Violence is a complicated social problem that possibly stems from many elements that warrant attention from researchers, policymakers, and the public," Shullman said.
Attributing violence to video games 'not' scientifically sound
Shullman explained that "attributing violence to video gaming is not scientifically sound" and draws attention away from other factors, such as a history of violence, which everyone knows from the research is a significant predictor of future violence.
It appears not likely that the assertion will change the minds of everybody that believes there is a correlation between violence and video video games, despite the truth that it must put the talk to rest. It is interesting to hear Shullman points to other factors that don't receive nearly as an excellent deal of media attention, however. Violent behavior has a tendency to be the most significant indicator of future acts of violence. Too often, there aren't follow-ups on this kind of behavior.
[TWEET]
Small connection among video game violence, aggressive actions are seen
While the APA does no longer find proof to support an instantaneous tie between video game violence and actual violence, the affiliation finds there may be a small tie among video game violence and "aggressive outcomes, inclusive of yelling and pushing." Anyone that has ever participated in a heated online game session with pals or online gamers can probably agree to that. Still, the same could also be argued for any different competitive event.
Franchises like Mortal Kombat and DOOM have a tendency to be the most frequently trotted out as scapegoats for violent acts. Of course, no sport acquired a much less deserved quantity of negative attention than Night Trap, a 1992 Sega CD recreation that resulted in a 1993 senate committee hearing on violent video games. The sport was re-released on current consoles a few years again. Despite the impresion it once obtained, the game looks quite tame today. Like the one's different violent games, it really doesn't seem like the sort of thing that could have inspired real violence. Perhaps the hysteria over violent video games of the early '90s definitely is just that.
