WikiLeaks is in hot water over a supposed proposal to expose the information of verified Twitter users was tweeted by the WikiLeaks Task Force. The idea quickly caused a commotion online and drew criticism.
However, WikiLeaks says the organization's planned database would simply be used for creating a proximity graph, which raises the question: for what is that graph exactly?
The tweet, which was eventually deleted, revealed that WikiLeaks was playing with the idea of gathering the personal information of all verified Twitter users into one database. Such info would include those pertaining to families, relationships, and even finances.
That certainly sounds like a surveillance plan or, worse, an opportunity for blackmail against verified Twitter users.
The WikiLeaks proposal was quickly taken by Twitter users as a creepy move and an outright doxxing threat, but WikiLeaks denied the allegations and insisted that the information would not be published. The organization went on to say that the idea was simply to create a proximity graph using the data of verified Twitter users.
.@kevincollier No it is to develop a metric to understand influence networks based on proximity graphs.
— WikiLeaks Task Force (@WLTaskForce) January 6, 2017
We are looking for clear discrete (father/shareholding/party membership) variables that can be put into our AI software. Other suggestions? — WikiLeaks Task Force (@WLTaskForce) January 6, 2017
Many Twitter users, especially verified ones, expressed doubt about the organization's intention.
Oh wow WikiLeaks is gonna dox all the verifieds that's super fucked up oh wait they're just creating proximity graphs, v cool makes sense pic.twitter.com/lM3N2Ckm6c
— Sara ❄ Schaefer (@saraschaefer1) January 6, 2017
@WLTaskForce I think this plan is creepy, I think you're creepy and I hope someone breaks into your house and rearranges your sofa cushions. — Ethan Lawrence (@EthanDLawrence) January 6, 2017
.@WLTaskForce Love it! I suggest you lead the way and share the full details of everyone involved with your Twitter account. You can do it!
— Sam Prell (@SamPrell) January 6, 2017
@WLTaskForce @kevincollier You don't need to know about my family to track my influence. No one is dumb enough to buy that BS. This is about intimidation. FULL STOP. — Kathleen Smith (@KikkiPlanet) January 6, 2017
However, the negative reaction is not exactly a surprise, considering how WikiLeaks has already doxxed Hacking Team, Sony, and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director John Brennans under the guise of transparency. While transparency has a nice ring to it, affecting the lives of uninvolved civilians simply by being connected to a powerful organization or personalities remains questionable and could ruin lives.
.@DaleInnis @kevincollier As we stated the idea is to look at the network of *relationships* that influence -- not to publish addresses.
— WikiLeaks Task Force (@WLTaskForce) January 6, 2017
Of course, WikiLeaks was quick to defend its proposed database, and even cited how Wikipedia, LinkedIn, Google, and Facebook have already been doing the same thing. But Twitter users were not buying it, especially after the group deleted the original tweet with a shortlist of information it wanted to gather.
And here's an example of what @LinkedIn does. Google? Facebook? Same. pic.twitter.com/c0L7HyZW4H — WikiLeaks Task Force (@WLTaskForce) January 6, 2017
Even Twitter founder Jack Dorsey retweeted the social media site's terms of use despite not providing any context. However, it is not too difficult to connect the message to the WikiLeaks tweet. Dorsey's tweet reminded people about privacy of information.
Posting another person’s private and confidential information is a violation of the Twitter Rules: https://t.co/NGx5hh2tTQ — Safety (@safety) January 6, 2017
News outlets were also quick to pick up the story, but WikiLeaks simply accused them of being dishonest and making false assumptions with regard to the doxxing accusation.
Dishonest press reporting our speculative idea for database of account influencing *relationships* with WikiLeaks doxing home addresses. — WikiLeaks Task Force (@WLTaskForce) January 6, 2017
@WLTaskForce Oh & also your defensive & rather uncivil rejoinders against the many posts expressing confusion/concern abt said announcement? — frankly, man (@fmlehman) January 6, 2017
The bottom line is that it is not only verified Twitter users who are concerned about WikiLeaks's plan but also regular users and even the organization's own supporters. Can WikiLeaks get out of this mess? The group's pronouncements, vague explanations, and defensive responses are not really doing anything to assuage people's concern.
@WLTaskForce It's not just the press, you've shaken your biggest supporters. My whole twittersphere who love you
— Sean Lester (@CursedObject) January 6, 2017
@WLTaskForce But why are we supposed to trust your stated motives any more than we would trust anyone else's? You guys are just as scary! — Gold & Youth (@GoldandYouth) January 6, 2017